Dating in little rock Henderson
It's Saturday evening, Aug.
Hinkle, Ark. Atlantic Richfield, Ark. Subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived by the parties or by this court. Moreover, the circuit court did not certify this appeal to our court under Rule 54 b on the basis that there was no just reason to delay this appeal, even though one issue remained to be resolved.
Supreme Court of Arkansas. She filed a grievance regarding this transfer. Henderson now appeals and questions the authority of Brady Gadberry to as or transfer her to Mablevale Elementary School and raises other issues as well. Rodgers, Ark. Lake View Sch. Thomas, Ark. Because a violation of Rule 54 b relates to the subject-matter jurisdiction of this court, we must raise the issue on our own. We do not countenance piecemeal appeals.
We recently presented a synopsis of our law relating to Rule 54 b in Hodges v. Hence, the violation of Rule 54 b deprives this court of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Henderson v. little rock school district
Finally, Petitioner argues that she is entitled to additional compensation under the PNA because she had earned additional college credits after she obtained her Master's degree. Rule 54 b states in pertinent part that any decision which adjudicates fewer than all of the claims of the parties shall not terminate the matter regarding any of the claims of the parties.
Dean v. Corporate Counsel. Hodges, Ark. Appeal dismissed without prejudice. This appeal arises out of appellant Sherry Lou Henderson's employment with the appellee Little Rock School District as a fine arts-music teacher.
Decided: June 04, Vincent C. Christopher J. Heller, Daniel L. Herrington, Little Rock, for Appellee. The School District treated this as a reation. Richardson v. Please try again.
This issue is not before the Court on the present motion, and Petitioner may pursue this issue if she gives notice to the Court and opposing counsel. Henderson contested Gadberry's authority to transfer her and did not report to work.
Reset A A Font size: Print. Tallman, Ark. There is no question but that an issue raised by Henderson in her complaint relating to back pay remains to be decided.
Legal Technology. Huckabee, Ark. We have said many times that the failure to comply with Rule 54 b and adjudicate all claims against all parties is jurisdictional and renders the matter not final for purposes of appeal.
She was advised in that letter that her failure to report to work would be considered an abandonment of the job. However, in doing so the circuit court added the following footnote to the judgment:.
Hodges v. See, e. However, in doing so the circuit court added the following footnote to the judgment: Finally, Petitioner argues that she is entitled to additional compensation under the PNA because she had earned additional college credits after she obtained her Master's degree. Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select.
Thank you for subscribing! At oral argument before this court, counsel for the parties stated that this issue noted in the footnote remains unresolved.
We must dismiss this appeal without prejudice due to a violation of Rule 54 b of our Rules of Civil Procedure. Explore Resources For Practice Management.